© 1999 D’Arcy
Rheault
This paper present, in a basic way, Anishinaabe[1] cultural and spiritual ethical codes.
Consequently, I will discuss some of the foundational tenets of
Anishinaabe philosophy and their role in Anishinaabe life. The Introduction, as a way of setting the context of
this paper, discusses an Anishinaabe auto-history that strives to give the
reader a glimpse of the world from an Anishinaabe perspective. The section Mother Earth and Cultural Codes
explains the relationship of the Anishinaabe to the Earth and how this
relationship forms the basis of some Anishinaabe cultural codes.
The sections Creator and Spiritual Codes and Teachings
discuss the role of Creation, the Creator and Teachings in the formation of
Anishinaabe spiritual codes and how this influences an Anishinaabe person’s
life. The final section on The Sacred
Circle will deal with the place of the Anishinaabe in this Westernised
society as well as with general differences between Anishinaabe and non-Native
worldviews.
To better understand Anishinaabe cultural
codes it is necessary to set out the historical context within which these
codes find themselves. Anishinaabe
history, from an Anishinaabe perspective is not that history usually taught
within the context of Western acquisition.
Anishinaabe autohistory (self-history) is an ethical approach and it is
based on two premises. The first is
that, in the way Europeans appropriated Indigenous territory, the cultural
values of the Anishinaabe influenced the formation of the character of the
Euro-American. Consequently, European
values did not modify the cultural codes of the Anishinaabe, since the
Anishinaabe never left their natural milieu (Pirsig: 1991).
It may seem that many, if not all, the
ways of the Anishinaabe were lost or destroyed in the ever increasing
acquisition of land and home by Euro-Americans, and this is why I say ‘cultural
codes’ when speaking of that thing that has remained after five hundred years
of contact. I am well aware that this
is a subtle point, but nevertheless it is evident once the layers of western
influence are brushed away. Once this
bit of house cleaning is accomplished we are left with the realisation that for
all intents and purposes the Anishinaabe have overcome the never-ending
offensive of western ways. Native
peoples may live in back-splits with a car in the driveway and a VCR in the
living room, and some of us may never have lived on a reserve or spoken our
ancestral language, but these are only the outer appearances of a people. Within, we are nevertheless Anishinaabe.
The second premise in this ethical approach to
Anishinaabe autohistory is that history (that is western history) still has not
always understood that the study of the persistence of the essential values of
the Anishinaabe, (with the help of these people themselves), is more important
than the analyses often made of cultural transformation and/or destruction, as
interesting as this may be academically but of little importance socially. (Sioui: 1989)
I admit straightaway that from the point of view
of an Anishinaabe person, the persistence of essential values or codes is more
important than change, and that, from the point of view of the dominant
culture, the interest has always been in attempting to support the myth of the
disappearance of Native peoples. But
this is only a difference of perspective, and as such culturally
sensitive. This cultural sensitivity,
for the Anishinaabe, is in part defined by the cultural codes that they follow
and it goes without saying that this cultural code is constant.
If we accept the two premises above, we can
appreciate how much, on an historical, cultural and social level, it is
essential to know who the Anishinaabe are in order to understand their
worldview and philosophical priorities.
An underlying truth for the Anishinaabe is the
inherent relationship, and belief in a relationship, with Mother Earth. The Anishinaabe are physically and
spiritually bound in this relationship, and this relationship defines each
person as child of this Mother.
Mother Earth is the underlying constant. The Mother unfolds beneath our feet as the
ground on which we stand. Without the
Mother there would be no life and no reason to live. This may seem mystical in context, but mystical or not it is the
very truth by which we exist. It would
seem that all life, humans included, has at one time or another felt a tie to
the Mother. The one fact that seems to
distinguish the Anishinaabe from those who live in a Western Euro-American way
is that the Anishinaabe understand that the umbilical cord was never cut. Like a foetus in its mother, we are
constantly drawing nutrition and life from our Mother. We cannot go anywhere without her, and even
in our most far reaching voyages we are dependent on the life our mother
provides for us; ask any astronaut.
So what is it about the Earth Mother that
permeates Anishinaabe philosophies? In a word: circularity. We are witnesses to the circularity of the
seasons, of life and death and life again, to the cycles that drive our very
existence. The Circle of Life [2], the inter-connectivity of all Beings, is the primordial worldview and
it is the very essence of Anishinaabe-ness as well as the foundation of
Anishinaabe cultural and spiritual codes.
As we have seen, the ‘cultural code’ that binds
us, like the cultural umbilical cords that are our respective cultures, is the
Circle of Life as taught by Mother Earth.
We are aware of this truth and it is in this truth that we again are
witness to the constant context of Anishinaabe life. Rémi Savard, in his Destins
D’Amerique (The Destiny of America)
states that:
the
genuine American dimension, to which present day Indigenous peoples urge us
towards, is neither English, neither French, neither Indian, neither Inuit; it
is found in the Indigenous notion of
the Great Circle, in accordance with which the obsessive respect of the specificity
of each link becomes the indispensable condition in maintaining the whole. We no longer have any choice; it is of this
America that we must seriously reflect upon in order to finally disembark. (Savard:
1979, 15 (lib. trans.))
As an example of a cultural code, the Anishinaabe
code of family and community is one that has an unbroken connection to
pre-contact. In the day to day reality
of the past five hundred years it would seem that Anishinaabe identity has lost
this truth, but again it is only a question of digging a little to find its constancy. The nuclear family has become the norm in
this present social order and in many cases Native families live this way, but
the mention of a person’s Clan removes all doubt that the family and community
code has been lost. Granted there are
many Native people who no longer know their Clan, but the Clan concept, this
one cultural code, still exists.
We are taught that Clans came about when the
animals decided to adopt the Anishinaabe because of the difficulties we were
experiencing when we first arrived on Earth. At seasonal ceremonies, Clan
affiliation is of paramount importance for the functioning of ritual. All people present at the ceremonies are
constantly reminded to find their Clan, through family research or even through
adoption, so that they can find their place in the culture as well as in the
world at large. Clan allows a person to
find his or her place in the Circle of Life.
Spirituality is the beginning of any attempt to
understand Anishinaabe worldview, but it is also spirituality that is found
when we finish digging for the truth.
Spirituality is the underlying truth and without it the cultural codes
would have been destroyed long ago.
The spiritual code that connects and unifies
Anishinaabe perspective concerning life and meaning is at the very centre of
Anishinaabe philosophy. The beginning
for the Anishinaabe is found in Creation.
This reality is not born of some random ordering of cosmic dust, but
rather the expression of a Creator’s thought.
This is the underlying spiritual code that maintains and gives meaning
to how and where we live.
What makes up the singular force of Anishinaabe
philosophy is the capacity of all Anishinaabe Nations to agree on the idea of
the unity and dignity of all Beings.
The Anishinaabe person, when s/he prays, addresses her/his salutations
to the universe. This allows her/him to
recognise her/his place in Creation. We
are sitting (when we are assembled) with the Great Circle of universal life. We are all equal, life is all equal.
The one unending and unchanging reality of
Anishinaabe philosophy is the place and importance of Teachings. As a mainly oral culture (with some
exceptions), Anishinaabe philosophy has placed all its merit on the truth found
in Teachings. James Dumont, an Ojibwe
scholar stresses that,
If we try to
understand and sensibly appreciate Native [Teachings] we must be willing, first
of all, to accept that there is involved here a very special way of ‘seeing the
world’. Secondly, and a necessary
further step, we must make an attempt to ‘participate’ in this way of seeing’
(Miller et al.: 1992, 75)
Consequently,
we must understand the “comprehensive, total viewing of the world and [how it]
is essential for a harmony and balance amongst all of Creation” (Miller et al.:
1992, 75).
If this is the case, than any interpretation of
Anishinaabe Teachings must include a comprehensive understanding of the people
themselves. Teachings not only
influenced personality, society, religion, action and ethics, they also set out
the proper context for a person to live in.
Teachings give life meaning.
Thus the Creation Teachings, from the Creation of the First Man, his
going about the world and naming all that is, his life with his Grandmother,
and the origin of the first family, to the story of the great flood and the
Creation of the New World, holds a prescription for a person’s daily life. Without these Teachings s how would a person
know how to be a good person? As such,
Anishinaabe Teachings are oral reference libraries that account for stories,
legends, prophesies, ceremonies, songs, dance, language and the custom of the
people. Moreover, the Elder,
responsible for this oral library, is as much the librarian as the library of
this knowledge. The Teachings are as
alive as the person hearing them or telling them. They exist in a dynamic form, changing as life changes. Its is for this reason that Teachings are
important, and it is for the same reason that we must listen to their voices.
In everyday life, our will and desire for western
material things can separate us from the inter-connectivity of the Sacred
Circle. As we try to balance the
reality of spirituality and our back-splits and VCR’s there are times that we
forget (at times conveniently) that we are not separate and remote in this
existence. We forget that we are
forever linked to others (both human and non-human persons [3]) in the world, and in the end to Creation itself.
Generally, there
is a fairly evident division between Western and Anishinaabe conceptions of
existence. Joseph Couture, a Plains
Cree Medicine Man and Pipe Carrier explains that:
In the West,
classical existentialism stresses the utter validity of subjectivity, i.e., of
the feeling, reflective subject who has the freedom to make choices, and to
determine thus his/her life. Therefore,
what one does is of keystone importance.
The doing that characterizes the Native Way is a doing that concerns
itself with being and becoming a unique person, one fully responsible for one’s
own life and actions within family and community. Finding one’s path and following it is a characteristic Native
enterprise which leads to or makes for the attainment of inner and outer
balance. This is a marked contrast with
general Western doing which tends and strains towards having, objectifying,
manipulating, ‘thingifying’ every one and every thing it touches. (Couture,
1992)
Couture points out that the ‘doing’ of life for
the Anishinaabe person is one of being and becoming good. It is a way of life that is both spiritual
and ethical. Choice exists for both the
Western and Anishinaabe person, but it seems to me that the Anishinaabe person
has the added dimension of following an ideal path rather than creating the
path itself. Choice is a tool of
actualisation rather than of invention.
Again, the main concern is of being good rather than simply doing
good. This fact is found in a
translation of the name of the people, “Anishinaabe”: the Good Being.
Anishinaabe philosophy also stresses the
interconnectivity of Creation rather than the connectivity of a physical and
spiritual world. Western tradition,
since the Greek philosopher Plato (428-348 B.C.E.), has attempted to divide
reality into a rigid duality. Plato
posited a two-world metaphysics of the intelligible and the sensible with a
very clear division between the two.
The French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) later refined this
idea to a separation of mind or soul and body.
The Anishinaabe do not separate the mind and body. There is an understanding of the person as a
whole lived being. There is mention of
the four aspects of the lived person; namely, mind, body, spirit and emotion,
but they are not seen as independent, separate divisions.
Within the cycle
of birth and death it is evident that everything that exists has a beginning and
an end. For the Anishinaabe, the
divinity of life is paramount.
Nevertheless, the Anishinaabe are not simply animistic. It is not a simple matter of saying that all
is alive; that there is no inanimate.
Rather, it must be understood that all is animate potentially, and that
this life can be actualised in various fashions, but always by way of
choice-making. As such, I find myself
part of a vast community called Creation, immediately connected to all its
aspects. For non-human beings, the path
of life unveils itself in a simple direct manner, but I must work harder at
following the path. Humans are beings
that have the tendency to wander about, unlike non-humans that are more
directed due to their state of existence.
Humans are considered the weakest being in the world. Each human needs a great deal of help in
finding the potential of his/her life path, and even more help in learning to
actualise it. We are not necessarily in
tune with our intuitive abilities and, as such, struggle somewhat.
In
Creation, one is never alone. The
divine is everywhere. Everything
received is a gift since at each level I am in a personal relationship with
Creation. Everything ¾ all action, all thought, all emotions ¾ have a personal texture and import. Nevertheless, I am not anonymous in an
impossibly crowded world such as we know today. I am unique: the only
example of myself. My sense of uniqueness,
my unique ability to choose and act, underlies my very existence. My moral agency gives me a sense of dignity
and I express this in taking complete responsibility for my choices. The Creator sets out an ideal Path of Life
for each being. It is my path in-so-far
that I may or may not choose to actualise it as I live.
In the Anishinaabe
life-way, I must be aware of all my relations, human and non-human, and as such
there is a rich sense of community. I
am never alone. Moreover, individual
accountability and understanding are intimately interrelated since only I can
understand: nobody else can make me
find the truth within.
Ultimately, this all comes down to what James
Dumont calls a special way of seeing the world whereby there must be a
comprehensive, total viewing of the world.
This special way of seeing the world involves the ability to ‘see’ the
potential therein. The Anishinaabe have
always understood that the place of humans in this world is only that of one
type of Being among many others.
The creative power
of existence always nurtures the life that is created. Ultimately, existence is totally dependent
on Creation. This dependence on the
divine power of Creation is fundamental and as such there is a general sense
that nothing that exists can be taken for granted. All is divine by the very nature of Creation. There is also the knowledge that the divine
power of Creation can be trusted, and that all things are where they
belong. This is evident in the
knowledge that all things happen in their own way, for their own reasons. As such, Creation is meaningful and ordered.
The divinity and order of Creation makes every
moment precious and there is a sense of gratitude and humility for this
reality. Since all existence is divine,
all existence has a direct link to Creator and Creation. The interconnectivity of all life, potential
and actual, makes the world a safe and meaningful place where I am able to
explore and ultimately fully actualise my identity.
As we have seen, Anishinaabe philosophy is
centred on Creation and the Sacred Circle.
All things are inter-connected, and as such, our place in Creation
brings balance and belonging in the world.
Nevertheless,, since we interact with the world in
a mainly physical way, it is very difficult to see the physical/spiritual unity
of Creation. The Anishinaabe are a
dream conscious people who understand that dreams and visions are doorways into
the more expanded dimension of actual Creation. James Dumont explains that:
There
seems to be a vital link, then, for the [Anishinaabe}, between mythical times
and the present. In fact, it might be
said that mythical times become present when we approach the realm of the
sacred through the dream of the vision quest.
Perhaps this can be expressed as simultaneous realities. What we have called mythical time is
eternally present, and it occurs simultaneously with our present. (Miller
et al.: 1992, 78)
Since Creation is a complex of many aspects it is
necessary to develop the proper senses to be able to ‘perceive’ it
completely. The Anishinaabe use various
ceremonial rituals (Fasting, Sweet Lodge, etc.) to expand their perception of
reality.
We are taught that the Sweat Lodge is the closest
that we can get to the Creator in this physical manifestation. The Sweat Lodge represents knowledge and understanding
free of will and desire. It allows us
to uncover the truth that everything is where it belongs.
For the
Anishinaabe, the Sweat Lodge is a pivotal
ceremony. To enter the Lodge is to
literally re-enter the Mother’s womb.
Once inside we abandon the subjectivity and objectivity of our lives; we
abandon the relationship of us and them, subject and object. When we lose ourselves in the contemplation
of the infinite greatness of the universe and of Creation, by meditating on the
time that is past and is to come, by seeing the innumerable worlds that the
heavens at night actually bring before our eyes and thus have the immensity of
Creation thrust upon our consciousness, only then do we feel ourselves dwindle
to nothingness. As individuals, as lived
entities, we feel ourselves pass away and vanish into nothingness like a drop
in the ocean. We are united with
Creation, in it and of it. We are not
oppressed, but exalted by its infinity.
Once we rise above will and desire we rise above
ourselves as pure subjects. Once
Creation is no longer seen as some kind of differentiated substantiality but as
unity, we are filled with the sense of the sublime; we are in a state of
physical/spiritual balance.
It is important here to understand fully the
meaning of unity. Creation is not a
movement towards unity, but rather is unity in movement (i.e., more than the
sum of the totality). To think that
Creation can only be grasped by the senses, or conversely, that it can only be
grasped by the mind, is to give either the sensible or the intellectual more
importance than the other. Creation is
harmony in seeming duality, it is the unity of Being rather than the unity of
the intellectual and the sensible or of the objective and the subjective. This underlying harmony is what gives
meaning to the perceived dualities of life.
Nevertheless, any attempt to call Creation the synthesis of this or any
duality is an attempt to do away with duality.
Duality is a matter of fact. We
find duality in all aspects of our lives, i.e., hot and cold, light and dark,
etc. This duality is of the actual kind
as experienced in life, and not the metaphysical duality as expressed in
Western philosophy. Ultimately Creation
cannot be thought of as global or Creator oriented, as in a synthesis, since it
is the harmony of all duality. In other
words Creation is not simply a conglomeration of all that exist objectively
(known and unknown) put together by a Creator, but it is the harmony that is
found in both the total collection of all that is, and the individual beings
themselves, including Creator. By this,
I mean to say that each individual (human and non-human) is as much a
representation of the whole of Creation as the whole of Creation is a representation
of itself. This may all seem rather
mystical from a Western perspective, but simply put, we are taught that we are
each the physical/spiritual manifestation of the whole of Creation and that it
is our responsibility and duty to live a good life so that Creation is
maintained. Creation is, and as such
all that is, is Creation. For the
Anishinaabe this is the highest goal of a good life. When a person comes out of the Sweat Lodge, they are united in
Creation, of it and as it, swallowed up by the infinity. Only then can a person truly say that they
are alive and living in a good way.
We have seen that Creation is a dynamic process,
unfolding and becoming, yet we live in a world seemingly made up of static
constancy. The truth found at the centre
of the Circle of Life is that we must constantly fight the static reality that
we put so much faith in, since it is the self that is at the centre of the
Circle of Life, one and the same with Creation. In our incomplete perception of the world, it seems that static
quality allows for laws of nature and society, for instance, but even gravity
has to give up its grip from time to time.
Gravity may be a constant in the universe, but Creation looks at this
static constant and replies to this challenge with a dynamic solution.
Look in the sky — everyday we can find a bird
flying, showing us the way to fight static reality. The bird is dynamic in its reality, and the best part is that,
that bird up there is not doing it to make a statement — birds fly!.
One of the greatest human tragedies is that we are constantly allowing
ourselves to believe that there is nothing that we can do about the seemingly
static, unchanging and unchangeable world around us.
I have discussed many issues and points in this
paper, and at times the expression of these ideas was mystical and esoteric in
nature, nevertheless, these thoughts express some of the understanding I have
gained from listening to the Elders and Traditional Teachers. These are not simple or easy concepts to
grasp, nor are they meant to be. The
Circle of Life that I spoke of has a centre, and at that centre I find
myself. As the centre of this wheel I
am the focus as well as the hub that holds all the aspects together. These reflections are relevant and true for
me since they are some of the spokes that radiate from my centre.
I have been taught that there are seven directions in every instance of the present. There are the four cardinal directions, each with its own teachings, as well as above to Creator, and below to Mother Earth. But it is the seventh direction that is ultimately the most important. The seventh direction is the centre, and the centre is where I find myself. It is my responsibility to journey to the six directions, but it is my duty to return to the centre with the new teachings I have received in those directions. At the centre I must take those teachings received, and integrate them into my life as one being among many. I have been told that in doing this I will ultimately find the centre of the centre, that is, the underlying codes of a good life..
© Copyright 1999-2003 by D’Arcy Rheault
[1] The Anishinaabe Peoples reach from the Atlantic coast in the East to the Rockies in the West and from what is now known as Northern Ontario and Quebec to North Carolina in the South and Northern California and Mexico in the South-west, with exception of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) territories south of the Great Lakes. The Anishinaabe language family is the largest in North America. It includes many Nations with a common history who speak a similar language with linguistic roots that can be traced back to the Atlantic Coast. “Anishinaabe” means “the good being, male of the species that came from nothing and was lowered down to the Earth”. In central North America (Ontario, Manitoba, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota) the Anishinaabe are generally referred to as Ojibwe (variations: Ojibwa, Ojibway, Chippewa).
[2]This is also referred to as the Medicine
Wheel.
[3]
For the Anishinaabe the scope of what constitutes an animate being or
person is much broader than what is understood in the West. It is normal to refer to a Teaching, a
stone, an animal or a ceremonial Pipe for example, as a person in the same way
that we usually refer to a human being as a person.
References
Couture, Joseph,
“The Role of Native Elders: Emergent
Issues.” In The Cultural Maze: Complex Questions on Native Destiny in
Western Canada, ed. John Friesen, 201-217. Calgary: Detselig Enterprises, 1991.
Dumont, James,
“Journey To Daylight-Land Through Ojibwa Eyes”, in David Miller, et al. (eds.),
The First Ones: Readings in Indian/Native
Studies , Sask.: Sask. Indian Federated College Press, 1992, pp. 75-80.
Pirsig, Robert, Lila, An Inquiry into Morals , New York:
Bantam Books, 1991.
Savard, Rémi, Destin
d’Amerique. Les Autochtones et nous , Montréal: …Édition de l’Hexagone,
1979.
Sioui,
Georges, Pour une Autohistoire
Amerindienne , Laval: La Presses de l’Université, 1989.